Showing posts with label Rousey. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rousey. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 3, 2016

Fighting For The Right To Fight



L.A. Jennings provides valuable social and historical context on the participation by and influence of women in combat sports.

By Diane Curtis

Women have been engaged in combat sports for centuries. Today, the most dominant athlete alive is a female fighter — a thought that would have been unheard of in the not-so-distant past, when women in combat sports were derided, dismissed, and/or fetishized. This was no accident of history; rather, it was a rocky but steady climb of progression (and backlash) built upon the hard work, sacrifices, and triumphs of generations of competitive women who would not be denied. In every arena — that of public opinion, before athletic commissions, and in actual arenas — they fought for the right of all women to fight.
In She’s a Knockout!: A History of Women in Fighting Sports, author, scholar, and mixed martial arts fighter/trainer L.A. Jennings chronicles the lives, careers, and exploits of these trailblazing boxers, wrestlers, and martial artists, providing valuable social and historical context along the way.







In her preface, Jennings rightly points out that, “if fighting is as old as man, then it is as old as woman, too.” Fighting, at its most basic level, is not and has never been the exclusive domain of the male sex. Fighting is instinctively coded into each and every one of us. It is the essence of life for every species, humans included. We are all fighting, in one way or another, and we always have been. Naturally, this applies to both men and women.
So it should come as no surprise that women have been interested in fighting sports — as spectators and practitioners — for far longer than popular memory would allow. Reading recent news articles and opinion pieces about such fighters as Holly Holm, Laila Ali, or Ronda Rousey, you would be under the distinct impression that women have only gotten the urge to lace up the gloves in the past few decades.
Jennings often had mixed emotions upon reading such articles. She was excited to see women’s combat sports move out of the margins and into the spotlight, but at the same time, seeing the rich histories of those same sports — and the women who built them — forgotten and ignored was deeply upsetting to her.
This book is her answer to that exclusion.
In her introduction, Jennings touches briefly upon the general history of boxing and how it has evolved over the centuries, as well as several styles of wrestling and martial arts traditions going all the way back to ancient Egypt, Greece, and Rome. If you’re unfamiliar with boxing beyond the Rocky series, it serves as an excellent primer. If you’re a long-time fight fan, there are new and fascinating tidbits throughout.
She then fast-forwards to the Georgian and Victorian eras, for which we have more reliable written records, and introduces us to Elizabeth Wilkinson Stokes, the “European Championess.” Stokes was an Englishwoman who began her career in 1722 by calling out fellow pugilist Hannah Hyfield via a public notice in the London Journal. (This is just one of the historical examples proving that, when it comes to boxing promotion, the more things change, the more they stay the same.) Stokes took approximately 22 minutes to triumph over Hyfield, and she fought for another six years after.
Jennings demonstrates a textbook Armbar submission technique on spouse and gym co-owner Mike Jennings. Photo by Bryan Carr, courtesy of L.A. Jennings.
In addition to fighter and fighting history, Jennings also provides valuable insight into the ways in which female fighters were regarded by society. Fighting sports were almost the exclusive domain of the lower classes, where women often had more freedom of movement within their social circles. They were expected to labor alongside men on farms, and, later, in factories, and so a woman expressing herself in a physical manner was not as foreign or repugnant an idea as it was to the upper classes.
This does not mean women had an easy path, or that they were readily accepted as professional prize fighters. They faced derision and road blocks at every turn. And when they were allowed to fight, it was a lurid spectacle meant to titillate men, typically the upper classes out for an evening. Any regard as legitimate fighters was still centuries away.
During the 1800s in America, prize fighting in general remained rare, intermittent, and below ground. The prudish Victorian middle class regarded it as barbaric, and the gambling that was always associated with it as immoral. But in the mid-1800s, the National Police Gazette, a rather sensational publication akin to today’s tabloids, began promoting and reporting upon matches, including women’s bouts. Boxing once again started to gain a foothold of legitimacy.
Fighting became more visible and organized. Match rules were established and agreed upon. Acceptance of the sport grew, as did the number of female fighters, although boxing remained at the margins of society.
The 20th century brought the rise of the Gibson Girl, and, at the same time, the sporting woman as society’s ideal of health and beauty. Girls’ boxing gyms were established so that middle- and upper-class girls and women could spar and remain fit. Most didn’t train for competition, but many of them learned the ins and outs of the sport and started to follow professional prize fighting as spectators. It was only a matter of time before they wanted the right to compete, too.
As in other social arenas, including suffrage, the right to work, and the right to a higher education, women’s participation in organized athletics gained momentum in the 20th century. From the 19th Amendment to Title IX, women steadily gained the right to full participation in all aspects of public life.
Jennings concludes her book with a chapter on recent history, and the area most casual fans are the most familiar with: that of women in today’s arena of mixed martial arts. And while UFC phenom “Rowdy” Ronda Rousey is responsible for much of their broad appeal nowadays, she is by no means the pioneer in this sport. Jennings introduces us to the other women fighters every fan should know, like Sarah Kaufman, Cris “Cyborg” Justino, Miesha Tate, Julie Kedzie and Gina Carano. The last two made history in the first-ever televised WMMA match.
Also, the UFC isn’t the first organization to promote women’s matches. In fact, it’s the last. The UFC simply built upon, borrowed, moved over, or bought out all of those who came before, including Hook-n-Shoot, Strikeforce and Elite XC. Now, they have their sights set on the all-female Invicta FC, nearly cleaning out their Strawweight division in order to build one of their own.
Four years after famously declaring women would “never” fight in the UFC, the organization’s President, Dana White, is now a thoroughly converted fan. And it feels as though further weight-class expansions, most likely Featherweight and Flyweight, are on the horizon. For women in MMA, the future looks bright.
So, while we all keep our eyes on the prize, Jennings reminds us that we shouldn’t forget the past, either:
“Despite risks of social alienation and even scuffles with the law, these historic female fighters were relentless in their pursuit of the sports they loved. Their courage reminds us that as important as it is to look forward to the next fight…it is just as crucial that we look back and remember the women who gave us the audacity to fight today.”

Q&A with the Author

L.A. Jennings. Photo by John Bosley, courtesy of the author.
D.E.C.: Could you start by telling us a little about yourself? Your general background, academic work, MMA training, and how they intersect?
L.A.J.: I started training [in] martial arts in 2003, and by 2006, the same year that I graduated from Florida State University with my B.A., I was competing in submission wrestling and kickboxing events. I earned my Masters in English from Florida State in 2008, all the while training and competing in martial arts, and a year later, moved to Denver, Colorado, to begin my doctoral program in Literary Studies at the University of Denver.
My academic work primarily focused on cultural theory, on what George Lipsitz called “the ordinary and the commonplace.” I am especially interested in gender studies and how meaning is generated through language, which is typically referred to as semiotics in academia. In my doctoral program, I realized that I was too busy to continue to compete, so I concentrated on coaching new fighters. My husband and I own a MMA gym in Denver called Train.Fight.Win. that provides fitness and MMA training in an egalitarian, gender-neutral environment.
My graduate student studies neatly coincided with my increasing interest in martial arts. I was training in a nearly all-male professional MMA gym, and I viewed all of my training and interactions through the theory I read in class, from Roland Barthes to Jacques Lacan to Judith Butler. I wrote a great deal about feminism, especially examining how powerful female characters, such as the femme fatale, are framed through formulaic narrative devices. I saw parallels in the way that the narrative structure of a hard-boiled detective novel, a closed system of meaning, limited the power of the femme fatale, similar in my mind to how the mixed martial arts community marginalized female fighters. Yes, a woman could participate in fighting (or, in the novel’s case, crime), but she would always be limited by the rules and structure of the world in which she operated. For female fighters, when I was competing, that meant the UFC (and in the hard-boiled detective novel, that meant the confines of the narrative’s functionality).
D.E.C.: What inspired you to write this? What impact do you hope it will have?
L.A.J.: I love history, and as I became more deeply engrossed in training, especially when I was first learning catch wrestling, I began to look for famous female fighters as inspiration. I found that I had to dig through a lot of hyperbole and inaccuracies in order to learn about the women who came before me in the sport. I want to tell everyone who loves fighting sports, male and female, that women had a long and storied history that impacted how MMA is practiced and produced today.
Jennings “Grounds & Pounds” Mariah Markus, one of her students at Train.Fight.Win. Photo by Bryan Carr, courtesy of the L.A. Jennings.
As an academic, I had access to libraries and databases that allowed me to thoroughly research the history of female fighters. It was a rigorous process, but I constantly experienced moments of delight when I would find an obscure article or create a connection to something happening in the fighting world today.
I hope that the book reveals the way that women’s history is often ignored, misconstrued, or intentionally hidden in order to create the myth that certain activities, such as fighting, have always been a man’s domain.
D.E.C: You write about the "Centerfold Imperative" for many women athletes. Do you think this is a double-edged sword for women who are judged harshly either way — sort of "damned if you do; damned if you don't?" Do you support the women athletes who choose to do this? If so, under what, if any, conditions? Or do you feel it actually does more harm than good, that there really is such a thing as bad publicity?
L.A.J.: I absolutely support an individual woman’s right to participate in any type of promotion she wishes. The problem is when women who are very talented do not receive the same opportunities as their more conventionally attractive counterparts because they do not conform to the beauty ideal. I do not think athletes who do pin-up or Playboy photoshoots should be condemned at all. But I do think that advertisers, such as Reebok, should be called out for only choosing conventionally attractive women to represent their sport.
D.E.C.: Now that women have a "place at the table" in the biggest global organization professional combat sports has to offer (UFC), what do you see as the next challenge? The next frontier?
L.A.J.: The next challenge is to make sure that all female fighters have a place in the UFC. Right now, only Strawweight and Bantamweight fighters are represented. It is not coincidental that these particular weight classes are populated by women who are an ideal size according to American beauty standards.
D.E.C.: One of the cornerstones of a sport's rise to legitimacy and the mainstream is a robust and well-managed youth development program. But "kids fighting in a cage" is the current, sensationalized narrative. At what age do you think it's appropriate for kids to start training? To start competing? As the owner of a MMA gym, what would that look like to you? What competition and safety guidelines would you see implemented in such a program?
L.A.J.: This is an interesting question; my gym does not have a children’s program and I do not have (nor plan to have) children myself. But my inclination is to say that children’s MMA could be organized in a way that is similar to football programs for children. There would be a structure that would determine at what age particular moves or strikes would be permissible and undoubtedly, an emphasis on safety by requiring more robust safety gear than what is appropriate for adult, professional MMA.
DEC: You state in your intro that the scope of this work had to be narrowed. What, if anything, do you regret having to leave out? Do you have plans for future works to expand on this subject and include that which you omitted this time around?
L.A.J.: I would have loved to do a more worldwide survey of women in fighting sports so that I could speak more as to how female fighters are positioned in other countries. However, I also think that would have been problematic. As an academic, I am perhaps overly concerned with my position and very hesitant to put myself in a situation where I would be ‘speaking for’ or representing women in other countries. For example, I would love to have included more about Muay Thai and the gender politics of Thailand’s fight scene, but it felt inappropriate since I would be looking at it as a complete outsider through an occidental lens. One of my dear friends, Sylvie von Duuglas-Ittu, has been living and fighting in Thailand for the past three years and is a much more informed voice on Muay Thai. Thus, while I did regret that the book was so focused on American and European history, it was probably for the best.
Currently, I am working with a nonprofit in Denver that provides services for women, children, and transgendered individuals experiencing poverty or homelessness. This is my passion project, so I have no plans to write anything lengthy for the next year or so. However, I do want to write an official history of MMA that will be a deep dive into the cultural history and implications of the sport.

She’s a Knockout!: A History of Women in Fighting Sports is available through amazon and other online retailers. If you’re heading out to pick up Ronda Rousey’s My Fight/Your Fight this week do yourself a favor and buy this, too.
  • Go to the profile of Diane E. Curtis

    Diane E. Curtis

    Atlanta-based Blogger and Web & Social Marketing Consultant. Former Academic, aspiring Sports Writer, eternal Geek Girl. http://dianeecurtis.com
  • Diane E. Curtis

    Tuesday, December 31, 2013

    In defense of Ronda Rousey

    ...as if she needs my help.  But seriously, enough with all the vitriolic comments about Ronda.  Check out my article on Fightland on what it means to be a bitch.

    Happy New Year, y'all!

    Thursday, December 19, 2013

    The "First" Male vs Female Fight to take place in Brazil on December 20th

    Check out my article on Fightland:

    The book continues to grow; four chapters down and three to go!

    Train hard and keep your hands up
    -L.A.

    A Feminist Scholar on Tomorrow Night's Possible Mixed-Gender Fight

    Fightland Blog

    By L.A. Jennings
     
    Tomorrow night, MMA promotion Shooto Brazil claims they will make history by putting on the first mixed-gender fight in history, between Juliana Velasquez and Emerson Falcao. Reaction in the MMA community has been resoundingly negative since the announcement was made earlier this week, with most people expressing concern about Velasquez’s welfare and criticism of Falcao. Some critics have decried the event as a mere publicity stunt and bemoaned the impression such a fight will leave on the minds of a generally still-MMA-skeptical public.

    But while Shooto claims that they are the first-ever promoter of a male/female fight, this type of event actually isn’t unprecedented in the fight world. While doing research for my book on the history of women in fighting sports, I’ve found more than a dozen references to mixed-gender fights. The archives don’t suggest that mixed-gender fights were common, but there is precedence in pugilistic history. There are cases of men fighting women in boxing and wrestling matches as far back as the 16th century. And these bouts weren’t necessarily publicity stunts; the literature we have in numerous archives only mentions the fights after they occurred, rather than before, meaning they weren't only being mentioned to sell tickets. And in many cases, the women won. I read only yesterday about a French woman in the early 20th century who knocked out three men in succession. There is also an account of a famous female wrestler who regularly beat young men in the catch-as-catch-can style into her 70s.

    One can also point to the famous "Battle of the Sexes" tennis match between Billie Jean King and Bobby Riggs in 1973 for precedence. Granted, there isn’t the threat of bodily injury in tennis that there is in a MMA fight, but at the time the media and general public expressed a number of fears and concerns that are being echoed in criticisms of tomorrow’s Shooto 45 match: that the female competitor might get injured because she is “weaker” than her male counterpart; that it won't be a fair fight because the man will feel guilty if he goes as hard as he normally would.
    But one of the more problematic critiques being expressed is that any fight between a man and a woman will be reminiscent of domestic abuse. Regardless of its intent, this type of thinking actually supports the arguments made by MMA opponents that the sport as a whole is inherently violent and negative and should be banned.

    MMA is a sport, with rules and referees. Juliana Velasquez and Emerson Falcao fighters are both athletes, and they’re entering in the cage on their own volition. Comparing their fight to domestic abuse is problematic because doing so suggests that women willingly endure partner violence. Not only is this attitude extremely demoralizing and unfair to victims of domestic abuse; it also yokes the sport of MMA with the language of criminal assault and battery. And that, in my opinion, is a slippery slope: By equating MMA with criminality in any way, regardless of how we may feel about the rightness or fairness of a mixed-gender fight, we only provide leverage for the critics who have used the worst kind of alarmist language to prevent places like New York State from legalizing the sport.

    Wednesday, August 29, 2012

    Who should Ronda Rousey fight next?

    www.MMAMania.com
    Ronda Rousey's star is continuing to rise after her victory of Sarah Kauffman.  Regardless of how you feel about Ronda (I love her) we all know she has got to fight again.  Let's make somewhat informed conjectures about her next opponent.  Wild, wild conjectures.

    Monday, March 12, 2012

    Ronda Rousey Training Video


    Love her or hate her, the girl is a champion.  This is some of the most eccentric and eclectic training I have seen in some time.  I feel so inspired to train right now, but I have to finish my term paper.  

    Enjoy!

    Monday, March 5, 2012

    The Aftermath: Rousey defeats Tate by her signature submission

    Esther Lin/Getty Images
     After all the build-up, the hype, the excitement and frustration, the fight between Ronda Rousey and Meisha Tate did exactly what I hoped it would do.  Saturday night's Strikeforce event demonstrated that female fighters have the skill, talent and aggression to put on an incredible show.  No one can doubt the legitimacy of Rousey and Tate and Sarah Kauffman and Alexis Davis as MMA fighters. 

    Thursday, March 1, 2012

    Hype or Hope? Meisha Tate vs. Ronda Rousey


    Strikeforce.com

     The upcoming Strikeforce battle between incumbent 135lb WMMA-champ Meisha Tate and relative newcomer Ronda Rousey takes place March 3rd in Columbus, Ohio.  The Rousey and Tate fight is an exhausted subject for many who claim the hype surrounding these two women has reached its saturation.  The fight has indeed been promoted and hyped with daily interviews, projections, twitter updates and general shit-talking from both women.  Many WMMA supporters are exhausted by the excessive publicity, claiming that there are other female fighters out there who deserve attention, which is absolutely true.  There are plenty of women fighting in smaller venues and training diligently to reach the critical mass currently occupied by Tate and Rousey.  But while I agree that Rousey's continual self-promotion and Tate's numerous attempts to exempt herself from the drama have become tenuous and somewhat annoying, the buildup of this fight is an integral part of bringing women out of the margins and into the forefront of the sport of MMA.  

                The problem is not the hype surrounding this fight; it is the constant insistence from multiple media outlets that Rousey or Tate must be ‘the face’ of WMMA.  Yet the search for a singular representative of the sport has been in place since Debi Purcell first came on the scene nearly a decade ago.  Although the popularity of the UFC and other MMA venues does not ride on the shoulders of one man, the sport of WMMA must, for some reason, apparently be embodied by one woman.  Gina Carano, now a B-movie star, failed to uphold this monumental position after her loss to Cris “Cyborg” Santos.  And Santos was never considered ‘the face’ of WMMA, primarily because her face does not conform to the standards of beauty necessary to become promoted by American sports media outlets.  The hype surrounding the Tate/Rousey fight reveals how female fighters will be promoted in the media as pageant contestants whose talents are punching and kicking rather than singing or dancing. 

    Tuesday, December 20, 2011

    Cris "Cyborg" Santos Defeats Yamanaka Hiroko in 16 Seconds



    Holy shit.  Everyone was talking when Ronda Rousey called out Meisha Tate in a recent interview.  Cris "Cyborg" Santos did the same thing this weekend...without words.  If Ronda continues to insist on dropping to 135 to fight Tate, it is going to reassert rumors that she is afraid to fight the Cyborg.  Hopefully, either more women will committ to the 145 weight class or Cris will somehow cut to 135.  I'm ready to see homegirl unleashed on the shit-talkers.

    Thursday, December 15, 2011

    Inspiration Thursday: Ronda Rousey


    Love her or hate her, Ronda Rousey is quickly becoming the 'face' of WMMA.  Personally, I love her.  In the short history of MMA and the longer one of Boxing, controversial fighters cause strife within the community, but ultimately promote the sport far beyond their quieter counterparts.  Is it fair?  No, but when the future of WMMA depends on sponsorship and large funds, a fighter like Rousey may save the sport from destruction.

    Tuesday, December 13, 2011

    Interview: MMA Fighter Cassie Crisano

    The absolutely gorgeous Cassie Crisano

    Cassie Crisano is a 145lb MMA fighter with a 1-1-1fight record.  A police officer, mother and MMA fighter, Cassie is a determined woman whose ultimate goal is to do what many fighters fear to do...fight Cris Cyborg.  


    Tuesday, November 29, 2011

    Tate vs Rousey: Representation and Sexualization of WMMA

    Carano vs. Santos - SherDog
    When Gina Carano transitioned from the face of WMMA to the protagonist of B-action movies, she left a void that promotors need to fill in order to continue the growth of the sport.  Cris "Cyborg" Santos should be the frontrunner of that category as the most deadly woman in the cage, yet she is featured more as a goliath than as the sexpot fighter Carano represented.  Perhaps it is her size, her ferocity or her drama-free atitude that promotors see as lack in Santos.  Carano was beautiful, Santos is...well, she's the Cyborg.

    Friday, November 25, 2011

    The Future of Women's MMA is 135

    Cris Santos vs Gina Carano 2009

    135 pounds, that is.  According to a recent interview with Cris Cyborg for Tatami magazine, Strikeforce will retain WMMA bouts even after their recent purchase by Dana White, known advocate against female participation in the sport.